Preparedness in Africa: How it’s evolved and what's next

2026

Tracking progress and building resilience

African countries are building stronger systems to advance health security and sovereignty. However, the scale and speed of rising health threats call for urgent actions and increased investment.

Key takeaways

  1. Africa’s health security capacity has improved, with gains across prevention, detection, and response. Scores in 52 of 54 countries and five of six categories improved by at least one point since 2021.

  2. More frequent outbreaks, climate change, unstable funding, and political and security risks continue to increase vulnerability. Investment and partnership are more important than ever.

  3. Biosecurity and biosafety capacities improved but remain critically low. As laboratory system capacities grow, matching investment in biosafety measures is essential to keep these systems safe and secure.

  4. Biosurveillance capacity is growing—52 of 54 countries increased this capacity, including expansion of wastewater-environmental and genomic surveillance.

  5. African countries have made substantial gains in medical countermeasure development and deployment since 2019, but a gap remains between those capacities. This presents a clear opportunity for targeted investment in workforce surge planning and deployment infrastructure.

  6. Climate related health security capacity is improving. African countries are strengthening the infrastructure needed to respond to climate change–related infectious disease threats.

  7. Regional health security infrastructure is strengthening, but unevenly. Fifty-two countries now have emergency operations centres, but only eight are tracking dangerous pathogen facility locations.

  8. National health security financing commitments show signs of strain. While seven countries newly demonstrated evidence of such, 18 stopped providing public evidence of financing commitments.

41.5 out of 100

+9.1 From 2021

The average country score in the 2026 AHS Index is 41.5, up from 32.4 in 2021. Although the progress shown is encouraging, persistent gaps and vulnerabilities remain.

See Methodology

Averages by category

Prevention

Prevention of the emergence or release of pathogens, particularly those that may constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

31.1 +9.3 From 2021

Subcategories

38.0

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 1.1.1-1.1.2

39.7

Zoonotic disease

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 1.2.1-1.2.5

14.9

Biosecurity

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 1.3.1-1.3.5

18.2

Biosafety

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 1.4.1-1.4.2

1.9

Dual-use research and culture of responsible science

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 1.5.1-1.5.2

45.8

Immunization

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 1.6.1

59.3

Climate change adaptation and vector transmission

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 1.7.1

Scores are out of 100

Detection and Reporting

Early detection and reporting of epidemics of potential international concern, which may spread beyond national or regional borders.

46.2 +20.0 From 2021

Subcategories

49.3

Laboratory systems strength and quality

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 2.1.1-2.1.2

29.6

Laboratory supply chains

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 2.2.1-2.2.2

64.2

Real-time surveillance and reporting

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 2.3.1-2.3.3

47.0

Surveillance data accessibility and transparency

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 2.4.1-2.4.5

19.4

Case-based investigation

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 2.5.1-2.5.2

67.6

Epidemiology workforce

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 2.6.1-2.6.2

Scores are out of 100

Rapid Response

Rapid response to and mitigation of the spread of an epidemic.

43.9 +11.4 From 2021

Subcategories

33.4

Emergency preparedness and response planning

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 3.1.1-3.1.3

22.9

Exercising response plans

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 3.2.1-3.2.2

38.9

Emergency response operation

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 3.3.1

14.8

Linking public health and security authorities

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 3.4.1

61.7

Risk communication

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 3.5.1-3.5.2

53.0

Access to communications infrastructure

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 3.6.1-3.6.4

82.4

Trade and travel restrictions

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 3.7.1-3.7.2

Scores are out of 100

Health System

Sufficient and robust health system to treat the sick and protect healthcare workers.

37.5 +13.2 From 2021

Subcategories

30.3

Health capacity in clinics, hospitals and community care centers

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 4.1.1-4.1.2

35.7

Supply chain for health system and healthcare workers

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 4.2.1-4.2.3

20.7

Medical countermeasures and personnel deployment

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 4.3.1-4.3.2

43.8

Healthcare access

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 4.4.1-4.4.3

27.8

Communications with healthcare workers during a public health emergency

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 4.5.1

47.5

Infection control practices

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 4.6.1

56.5

Capacity to test and approve new medical countermeasures

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 4.7.1

Scores are out of 100

Norms

Commitments to improving national capacity, financing plans to address gaps, and adhering to global norms.

49.0 +2.7 From 2021

Subcategories

70.4

IHR reporting compliance and disaster risk reduction

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 5.1.1-5.1.2

51.4

Cross-border agreements on public health and animal health emergency response

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 5.2.1

32.0

International commitments

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 5.3.1-5.3.2

21.8

JEE and PVS

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 5.4.1-5.4.2

50.5

Financing

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 5.5.1-5.5.4

67.9

Commitment to sharing of genetic & biological data & specimens

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 5.6.1

Scores are out of 100

Risk Environment

Overall risk environment and country vulnerability to biological threats.

41.4 -1.8 From 2021

Subcategories

41.3

Political and security risk

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 6.1.1-6.1.7

43.1

Socio-economic resilience

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 6.2.1-6.2.6

27.2

Infrastructure adequacy

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 6.3.1-6.3.3

50.8

Environmental risks

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 6.4.1-6.4.3

44.5

Public health vulnerabilities

Composite measure | Weighted average of the following indicators: 6.5.1-6.5.4

Scores are out of 100

What are our next steps?

No single country can face the next pandemic alone. When governments invest in preparedness, funders direct resources strategically, and partners collaborate on solutions, we all become safer.

Cross-cutting recommendations

  1. Govern what you’re building:

    • Require future investments in infectious disease research and pandemic preparedness and response to include biosecurity and biosafety resources and training. 
    • Develop a harmonized emergency use authorization framework to expedite regulatory pathways for medical countermeasures.
  2. Strengthen the detection-to-action chain:

    • Expand investment in emerging surveillance networks and early warning and detection systems, including wastewater and environmental surveillance and genomic surveillance.
    • Strengthen water and sanitation infrastructure to prevent disease transmission and address climate-related health pressures.
    • Formalize inter-country cooperation agreements that support the response to combat disease outbreaks.
  3. Close the deployment and financing gaps:

    • Build medical countermeasure deployment capacities to complement the push in manufacturing capabilities.
    • Publicly commit to financing pandemic preparedness through domestic resources, global commitments (like the Pandemic Fund), and co-investment opportunities.
    • Establish a global pandemic spending tracker and endorse minimum financing benchmarks for pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response.

Recommendations for

See All Recommendations

  • Require all future investments in infectious disease research and pandemic preparedness and response to include biosecurity and biosafety resources and training. 
  • Develop a national biosecurity and biosafety strategy, with guidance at the continental or regional level.
  • Establish and expand biosecurity and biosafety workplace training programs, implementing training requirements and recertification standards.
  • Develop dual-use research of concern oversight frameworks to be implemented at the national level, with guidance at the continental or regional level.
  • Require DNA synthesis screening at the point of procurement.
  • Improve collaboration between health and security sectors to bolster biosecurity capacities.
  • Establish a continental AI Safety Institute with responsibility for biosecurity and biosafety governance of AI-related tools and technology.
  • Continue Africa’s positive momentum toward Biological Weapons Convention ratification and submission of confidence-building measures.
  • Prioritize and expand investment in electronic and ongoing surveillance and reporting systems.
  • Close critical gaps in laboratory supply chains to ensure reliable diagnostic capacity during routine surveillance and outbreak response.
  • Support regions and countries with limited surveillance and reporting capacity, particularly in Central Africa.
  • Expand investment in emerging surveillance approaches and early warning and detection capacity, along with commensurate investment in decision-making tools to translate data into action.
  • Expand public–private partnerships to strengthen shared digital infrastructure for biosurveillance.
  • Support scalable solutions to reduce costs and improve access to surveillance tools and diagnostics.
  • Formalize intercountry cooperation agreements such as Memoranda of Understanding that support the response to infectious disease outbreaks that cross borders.
  • Continue to support regional structures to help countries cooperate to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease outbreaks.
  • Create additional opportunities for the public health workforce on the continent to build networks across countries.
  • Implement financing strategies across the health and security sectors to accelerate geographically diversified MCM development, manufacturing, and deployment.
  • Build robust MCM deployment capacities—such as workforce surge planning, last-mile distribution, and non-pharmaceutical intervention implementation frameworks modeled on initiatives like the 100 Days Mission—to complement the strong push on MCM development.
  • Prioritize the development of a harmonized emergency-use authorization framework as an integral component of the operationalization of the Africa Medicines Agency (AMA).
  • Strengthen regional MCM pooled procurement through the African Pooled Procurement Mechanism and leverage African Vaccine Manufacturing Accelerator’s financing mechanisms to prioritize manufacturing investments in countries and regions with the greatest gaps in MCM development capacity.
  • Establish at least one personal protective equipment manufacturing hub for each region, with stockpiles for essential long-shelf-life products.
  • Countries should incorporate the African Medicines Agency Treaty to allow national regulators to formally rely on AMA outputs.
  • Strengthen water and sanitation infrastructure to prevent disease transmission.
  • Adopt a One Health approach to disease surveillance by establishing and maintaining infectious disease surveillance systems within wildlife, poultry, and livestock populations.
  • Conduct vulnerability risk assessments in collaboration with ministries of finance that specifically identify the potential economic impacts of climate change–related natural hazards, including infectious diseases.
  • Support countries in identifying specific climate change–related infectious disease risks.
  • Country leaders and governments should make public and demonstrable commitments to financing pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response (PPR).
  • Establish a systematic, publicly accessible, global pandemic spending tracker and endorse minimum pandemic PPR financing benchmarks.

See All Recommendations

Explore the Data

2026 Africa Health Security Index

Explore the Data

The AHS Index data supports decision-making across sectors. Governments can use the AHS Index data to plan and prepare. International and regional organizations International and regional organizations, philanthropies and other funders, and the private sector can each use the country-level data to monitor health capacities, advocate for action, and inform targeted investment.

Partners & Supporters

The AHS Index is developed by NTI, the Brown University Pandemic Center, Economist Impact, and Science for Africa Foundation, in collaboration with the University of the Witwatersrand (Johannesburg, South Africa), and University of Tunis El Manar (Tunis, Tunisia). Funding is provided by the Gates Foundation.


Developed By:


In Collaboration With:


Funding Provided by: